They’ve been ignored, written off and passed over, and yet
more than 50 years later, the Pretty Things, through rock’s ever-changing
landscapes, through personnel changes the MIT Statistics Department would have trouble
tracking, through legendary legal donnybrooks, have managed yet another great
rock and roll album.
| The Pretty Things circa 1966 |
If you look up the definition of “freakbeat” you’ll probably
see a picture of the Pretty Things, but this is probably not an accurate way to
describe the influential London-based group.
Rather than being an obscure,
short-lived ensemble whose members went on to better things (or not), some form
of the Pretty Things has been around since the early ‘60s. And rather than
playing state fairs or oldies shows, the band is putting out tough new music
that slides quite nicely into their lengthy and wide-ranging oeuvre.
Singer
Phil May and guitarist Dick Taylor, despite time off at various points, have remained
the heart and soul of the Pretty Things through nearly its entire run. Garagerocktopia
was lucky enough to talk with May on telephone from the UK. We should
say that with a 50-plus year history, it’s rather tough to do justice to this
band in just a short article. The Pretty Things deserve a whole book, which
Alan Lakey has already written, “Growing Old Disgracefully.”The buzz on the street is that the new album an excellent one. The sound, in many ways, harkens back to the group’s blues roots from their very early days but is updated with vicious hooks and enough melody to burn. This album does not sound like a bunch of old guys grasping for one more hiccup of glory, but like a great British band that still has lots to say.
Actually, the new album is just part of a 2015 that has been a bonanza year for fans of the Pretty Things. A boxed set, “Bouquets from a Cloudy Sky,” was released in March to generally rave reviews, and has sold so well that finding it can be a little tough. As good as the boxed set was, there was an added bonus – it ignited the band into making a new studio album.
“We were up to our armpits sorting out the boxed set,”
recounted May, talking by telephone from London.
“(Manager) Mark St. John had been talking to the European label about the boxed
set and they wanted something new to inject into it. We found that putting the
boxed set together and the new songs fed each other.”
“It came about in a strange way,” May revealed. “You write
all the time, a voice inside you that never stops. Things come out in sound
checks and in all kinds of places, and in these circumstances, they coalesced
and things started happening very quickly. We got together and listened to what
we had and decided we had the bones for a decent album.”
The band has in the past had issues with too much
production, and part of what makes the new album apparently succeed so well is
that there’s not a lot of studio trickery – that it’s borderline live,
well-fitting the Pretty Things’ often rough and tumble style.
“We did it as live as we could. I hate studios, especially
when the technology just takes over,” May explained. “When you can go and just
do things, it’s great.”
So even though the band has seen its share of state of the
art, the Pretty Things decided to go fairly low-tech. They bypassed many great
studios in one of the most musically-stocked cities in the world to go hang out
with the flowers.
“This was recorded in a bloke’s shed in his garden,” May revealed. “Mark checked it out, and it worked perfectly. We’ve always been kind of a garage band anyway. We’ve recorded in Abbey Road and Olympic Studios. They’re like walking into the biggest music generators in the world, just throbbing with great (blankin’) music. But we made that shed throb, too.”
In a way, the Pretty Things are in an ideal spot personnel-wise,
with May and Taylor
keeping an essential continuity in place. There’s new blood, too, in the
persons of Frank Holland, George Perez, and Jack Greenwood. St. John, who has occasionally played with
the band, also contributes musically.
A very short, probably inadequate history of the band: The
Pretty Things started in 1963, and like so many of Britain’s immortal rockers – John
Lennon, Pete Townshend and Ray Davies to name just a few – Dick Taylor was an
art school student. And like those many
other young British musicians of the time, Taylor had a strong affinity for American
blues, that interest bonding him briefly in an early version of the Rolling
Stones.
| The Pretty Things circa 2015 |
Later, May and Taylor
hooked up and formed the Pretty Things, whose name was taken from the Bo
Diddley song of the same name. Like so many other British bands, the Pretty
Things were solidly rooted in blues.
But their take was always a bit rougher and harder-edged, making the Stones look like Herman’s Hermits. That image has many contending that the Pretty Things set the stage for heavy metal and punk bands later on. As Keith Richards once said in a BBC interview, “they don’t jump on bandwagons.”
But their take was always a bit rougher and harder-edged, making the Stones look like Herman’s Hermits. That image has many contending that the Pretty Things set the stage for heavy metal and punk bands later on. As Keith Richards once said in a BBC interview, “they don’t jump on bandwagons.”
Critics and music geeks have longed agreed that the Pretty
Things have always been a top-notch British band, and a groundbreaking one at
that, especially during the era from the early ‘60s to the mid-80s, when
artists from the UK
formed the gold standard for all rock and roll. But only sporadically have they
dented the charts, having to content themselves with accolades. The commercial
success so definitive of many of their contemporaries has long eluded them.
Click here and we’ll talk about some of these insufficiently-heralded
accomplishments and why, despite that, we still love their music so many years
after the fact.
The official Pretty Things website: http://www.theprettythings.com/
The official Pretty Things website: http://www.theprettythings.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment